Inadmissible grounds are an IRPA finding. A visitor visa refusal usually isn’t.
Sections 34 to 42 of the Act are the grounds. A letter that cites IRPR 179(b) is a different test.

Inadmissible means an officer found a ground in sections 34 to 42 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. A Canada visitor visa refusal that cites IRPR 179(b) is not that finding. IRPA 11(1) makes both tests mandatory: you are not inadmissible, and you meet the Act. Most refusal letters fail the second test.
The letter and the Act are two decisions
Subsection 11(1) says a visa may be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of the Act. The first half is Division 4 of the Act. The second half, for a visitor, is section 179 of the Regulations. Paragraph 179(b) is the leave-Canada test: it has to be established that you’ll leave by the end of the authorized stay.
A letter that says the officer isn’t satisfied you’ll leave, and then lists purpose, funds, ties, or travel history, is a 179(b) refusal. You can apply again. The old file stays on the system. What has to change is the part of the file the letter named. That path is how to read the refusal letter.
A letter that names security, criminality, a medical result, misrepresentation, or an IRPA section from 34 to 42 is the other decision. Sending a thicker visitor file does not remove the ground. IRCC’s public list of reasons you may be inadmissible is the same set, in plainer words. The section numbers below are the ones on the statute, current to September 21, 2026.
The grounds are sections 34 to 42
Serious criminality and organized criminality apply to a permanent resident and a foreign national. Criminality under subsection 36(2), health, financial reasons, and sanctions apply to a foreign national. A permanent resident is not inadmissible for ordinary criminality under subsection 36(2).
| Section | Ground | What the section actually says |
|---|---|---|
| 34 | Security | Espionage, subversion, terrorism, danger to the security of Canada, violence that could endanger people in Canada, or membership in an organization there are reasonable grounds to believe does those things. |
| 35 | Human or international rights | A war crime or crime against humanity, being a prescribed senior official of a government the Minister finds engaged in those acts, or conduct that would be an offence under Criminal Code section 240.1. |
| 35.1 | Sanctions | A foreign national who is the subject of a Special Economic Measures Act order, a Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act order, or a matching international sanctions measure. The ground ends when the restriction ends. |
| 36(1) | Serious criminality | In Canada: a conviction for an offence with a maximum of at least 10 years, or a sentence of more than six months. Outside Canada: a conviction or act that would be an offence with a maximum of at least 10 years. |
| 36(2) | Criminality | Foreign nationals only. An indictable offence, or two offences not from a single occurrence. A hybrid offence is deemed indictable even if it was prosecuted summarily. |
| 36(2.1) | Transborder criminality | A foreign national who, on entering Canada, commits a prescribed offence under an Act of Parliament. |
| 37 | Organized criminality | Membership or activity in a pattern of planned indictable crime, or transnational people smuggling, trafficking in persons, or money laundering. |
| 38 | Health | A foreign national whose condition is likely a danger to public health or public safety, or might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demand. Excessive demand does not apply to a sponsored spouse, common-law partner, or child, a Convention refugee, or a protected person. |
| 39 | Financial reasons | A foreign national who is or will be unable or unwilling to support themself or a dependant, and has not shown adequate arrangements other than social assistance. |
| 40 | Misrepresentation | Directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding a material fact that induces or could induce an error in the administration of the Act. The inadmissibility lasts five years. |
| 40.1 | Cessation of refugee protection | A final determination that refugee protection has ceased. The permanent-resident test is limited to the reasons in paragraphs 108(1)(a) to (d). |
| 41 | Non-compliance | A foreign national whose act or omission contravenes the Act, or a permanent resident who fails to comply with subsection 27(2) or section 28. |
| 42 | Inadmissible family member | A foreign national, other than a protected person, whose family member is inadmissible, or who is accompanying an inadmissible person. On a temporary resident application, only sections 34, 35, 35.1, and 37 count. |
IRCC’s inadmissibility overview is the public starting point. Where that page and the Act differ, the Act is the one an officer applies.
Impaired driving is serious criminality
Criminal Code section 320.19 makes operation while impaired, including by cannabis, a hybrid offence with a maximum of 10 years on indictment. Paragraph 36(3)(a) deems a hybrid offence indictable even when it was prosecuted summarily. Paragraph 36(1)(b) then treats a foreign conviction for the equivalent offence as serious criminality, because the Canadian maximum is at least 10 years. The sentence you actually received does not move it down to ordinary criminality.
Section 18 of the Regulations deems some people rehabilitated after 10 years, and after five years for two or more foreign summary offences. Both routes require an offence punishable in Canada by a maximum of less than 10 years. A 10-year maximum is outside that class. IRCC’s notice on impaired driving and immigration status says the same thing in operational language: you do not enter or stay unless a temporary resident permit is issued.
What does clear a criminal ground, when it applies:
- A Canadian record suspension that has not been revoked. Paragraph 36(3)(b) says inadmissibility may not be based on that conviction. A pardon from another country does not do this automatically. Guide 5312 says a conviction in Canada is dealt with by the Parole Board of Canada before you are admissible.
- Deemed rehabilitation under section 18, only for the class that section describes. One foreign offence with a Canadian maximum under 10 years, ten years after the sentence was completed, and no later conviction that knocks you out of the class.
- An individual rehabilitation application, five years after the sentence was completed, or five years after the act if there was no conviction. Guide 5312 says processing can take over a year. The fee is not refunded if it is refused.
- A temporary resident permit under section 24, if an officer finds it justified in the circumstances. It can be cancelled. It is not a finding that the ground is gone.
A youth sentence under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, a finding of guilt under the former Young Offenders Act, and a contravention designated under the Contraventions Act are carved out by paragraph 36(3)(e). An adult sentence is not.
The fees on the current list
These are the inadmissibility lines on the IRCC fee list as retrieved on September 28, 2026. The Service Fees Act adjusts several of them. A December 1, 2023 notice had the temporary resident permit at $229.77 and serious-criminality rehabilitation at $1,148.87. The list is higher now. Use the list, not a screenshot of an older notice.
| Application | Fee |
|---|---|
| Temporary resident permit | $246.25 |
| Rehabilitation, criminality | $246.25 |
| Rehabilitation, serious criminality | $1,231.00 |
| Authorization to return to Canada | $492.50 |
Authorization to return is section 52. Once a removal order has been enforced, you do not come back unless an officer authorizes it or a prescribed circumstance applies. The $492.50 fee is the application. It is separate from a temporary resident permit, and separate from rehabilitation.
Misrepresentation runs five years, from a specific date
Section 40 is a material fact, withheld or misstated, that induces or could induce an error in the administration of the Act. Paragraph 40(2)(a) keeps the person inadmissible for five years. Outside Canada, the clock starts at the final determination. In Canada, it starts the day the removal order is enforced. Paragraph 40(3) bars a permanent residence application during that period.
A 179(b) refusal does not start that clock. The letter has to be a misrepresentation finding. If yours is a purpose, funds, or ties refusal, the five-year bar is the wrong problem. The next step is the refusal letter, not a rehabilitation form.
A family member’s ground does not always travel with you
Section 42 makes a foreign national inadmissible because a family member is, or because they are accompanying someone who is. Subsection 42(2) cuts that down for a temporary resident, and for someone applying for temporary resident status. The family member’s ground counts only if it is section 34, 35, 35.1, or 37.
On a visitor visa, a spouse’s criminal conviction, medical condition, lack of funds, or misrepresentation finding does not make you inadmissible under section 42. Security, international rights violations, sanctions, and organized criminality still do. This exception is for temporary residence. A permanent residence application does not get the same cut-down.
Excessive demand is a cost test, not a diagnosis
Section 38 has three health grounds: danger to public health, danger to public safety, and excessive demand on health or social services. Section 1 of the Regulations defines excessive demand as anticipated costs above three times the average Canadian per capita health and social services cost over five consecutive years after the medical exam, or a demand that would add to a waiting list and increase mortality or morbidity because citizens and permanent residents could not be treated in time.
IRCC updates the dollar figure. The regulation is the test, and the figure is not in the Act. No condition is an automatic refusal: the help centre answer says officers look at the exam, the prognosis, the cost over the next five to ten years, and the effect on wait lists. Subsection 38(2) removes the excessive-demand ground for a sponsored spouse, common-law partner, or child, a Convention refugee, and a protected person. The danger grounds stay.
A mitigation plan is only available if IRCC invites one, and only in the procedural fairness response. It can cover outpatient medication and social services you will pay for. It cannot opt you out of publicly funded health services.
What this does not decide
This page maps the grounds and the fees. It does not equate your offence to the Criminal Code, and it does not tell you that you are deemed rehabilitated. That depends on the statute of the place of the conviction, the sentence completion date, and every later conviction. Guide 5312 says the explanations in the guide are not legal definitions.
If the PDF cites 179(b), use the letter. If it cites a section in this table, a resubmission pack is the wrong instrument. A Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant or a lawyer is the one who files rehabilitation, a temporary resident permit, or an authorization to return.
Canada Inadmissibility Grounds FAQ
Is a visitor visa refusal that cites IRPR 179(b) the same finding as inadmissibility under IRPA sections 34 to 42?
No. IRPA 11(1) has two parts: the officer has to be satisfied you are not inadmissible, and that you meet the requirements of the Act. A standard visitor refusal cites IRPR 179(b), which is the second part: the file didn’t show you’ll leave Canada at the end of your stay. Inadmissibility is a finding under IRPA sections 34 to 42. You can reapply after a 179(b) refusal. A new visitor application does not clear a section 34 to 42 finding.
Which IRPA sections, current to September 21, 2026, are the grounds from security through an inadmissible family member?
The Act lists them: security (s.34), human or international rights violations (s.35), sanctions (s.35.1), serious criminality, criminality, and transborder criminality (s.36), organized criminality (s.37), health (s.38), financial reasons (s.39), misrepresentation (s.40), cessation of refugee protection (s.40.1), non-compliance (s.41), and an inadmissible family member (s.42). The Act is current to September 21, 2026.
Does a foreign DUI count as serious criminality under IRPA 36(1)(b) when Criminal Code section 320.19 has a 10-year maximum?
It can, as serious criminality. Criminal Code section 320.19 sets a maximum of 10 years for operation while impaired, including by cannabis. IRPA 36(1)(b) treats a foreign conviction as serious criminality when the equivalent Canadian offence has a maximum of at least 10 years. IRPA 36(3)(a) deems a hybrid offence indictable even if it was prosecuted summarily. There is no deemed rehabilitation for that ground. A temporary resident permit is discretionary and the fee list shows $246.25.
How long does an IRPA 40(2)(a) misrepresentation finding last, and does the five years start at the final determination or when the removal order is enforced?
Five years under IRPA 40(2)(a). If the finding was made outside Canada, the five years run from the final determination. If it was made in Canada, they run from the day the removal order is enforced. IRPA 40(3) says you may not apply for permanent residence during that period. A visitor visa refusal that does not mention misrepresentation is not this bar.
On a temporary resident application, does my spouse’s criminal record make me inadmissible under IRPA 42, or only a family member inadmissible under sections 34, 35, 35.1, or 37?
Not by itself. IRPA 42(2) limits the family-member ground for a temporary resident. It applies only when the family member is inadmissible under section 34, 35, 35.1, or 37: security, human or international rights, sanctions, or organized criminality. Criminality, health, finances, and misrepresentation of a family member do not make you inadmissible under section 42 on a temporary resident application.
Watch the questions, the analysis, and the evidence
Check out this video to learn about answering a number of questions, get free analysis and personalized evidences for your application.
8 major factors Canada visa officer checks
| Officer checks | What they may look at |
|---|---|
Why Canada? Tourism, family visit, event, business, etc.; itinerary; duration; whether the activities make sense | Why Canada? Tourism, family visit, event, business, etc.; itinerary; duration; whether the activities make sense |
Employment, business, property, spouse, children, family responsibilities, studies, other obligations | Employment, business, property, spouse, children, family responsibilities, studies, other obligations |
Job stability, position, salary, length of employment, approved leave, business ownership and activity | Job stability, position, salary, length of employment, approved leave, business ownership and activity |
Bank balances, transaction history, income, savings, source of funds, ability to pay for the trip and return | Bank balances, transaction history, income, savings, source of funds, ability to pay for the trip and return |
Family remaining in the home country versus relatives/family in Canada; overall circumstances | Family remaining in the home country versus relatives/family in Canada; overall circumstances |
Previous international travel, visas, compliance with previous visits, previous Canadian/US/UK/Schengen travel, etc. | Previous international travel, visas, compliance with previous visits, previous Canadian/US/UK/Schengen travel, etc. |
Previous refusals, overstays, unauthorized work/study, removals, previous applications and information provided | Previous refusals, overstays, unauthorized work/study, removals, previous applications and information provided |
Criminality, security, medical/financial inadmissibility, misrepresentation, and whether the information/documents are consistent and credible | Criminality, security, medical/financial inadmissibility, misrepresentation, and whether the information/documents are consistent and credible |
What is ImmigrationDM?
ImmigrationDM makes it easy to respond to a Canada visitor visa refusal.
You can use the Refusal Analysis to read the officer's reasons and see the missing paper. It asks about country, purpose, funds, and home ties, then you paste the letter. You get the concerns in order and the documents that prove each claim.
The free checkers test the money side of the file before you submit. The Source of Funds Checker shows whether the file explains where the money came from. The Trip Cost Checker compares the trip you typed with the balance you typed.
No matter where you are after a Canada visitor visa refusal, ImmigrationDM is here to help you prepare the next file.
Tools to help with a stronger application
Same checkers as the tool pages. They run on what you type.
Source of Funds Checker
Want the full analysis?
This check only looks at the money. Officers also look at ties at home and whether the trip looks temporary.
Get the full analysis →Trip Cost Checker
Want the full analysis?
This only compares the trip with the balance. Officers also look at ties at home, whether the trip looks temporary, and the many other pieces of evidence.
Get the full analysis →Canada immigration laws
The consolidated Act and Regulations on Justice Laws. IRPA 34 to 42 is the on-site grounds page.
- IRPR — Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations
- IRPR 179 — temporary resident visa
- IRPR 180 — a visa is not entry
- IRPR 180.1 — cancelling a visa
- IRPR 183 — how long the stay lasts
- IRPR 30 — medical examination
- IRPA — Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
- IRPA 11(1) — the examination
- IRPA 20(1)(b) — leave at the end of the stay
- IRPA 22(2) — dual intent
- IRPA 39 — financial inadmissibility
- IRPA 40 — misrepresentation
GCMS notes versus officer decision notes
The decision note comes with the refusal letter. GCMS notes are the rest of the file.
GCMS notes vs officer decision notesWhich applications get the note with the letter, from which date, and when you still request the file.Read the guideOther Canada visitor visa immigration resources
These pages cover the refusal letter, the money, the ties, and the papers that change by country.
How to read the refusal letter
The letter cites IRPR 179(b) when the officer wasn't satisfied you'll leave Canada. Read the factors under that line before you apply again.
Read the guideWhat to change before you pay again
Match each factor on the letter to the document that answers it. Sending the same file again rarely changes the result.
Read the guideYou can reapply. There is no waiting period.
IRCC doesn't set a cooling-off period. The next officer already has the refused file, so the new one has to be different.
Read the guideWhen a lump does not match income
A large closing balance doesn't show where the money came from, whether you can use it, or whether income continues.
Read the guideWhat weak ties means
The officer is saying the file doesn't prove you will go home. This page shows how officers measure ties.
Read the guideThe reasons behind most refusals
Travel history, ties, purpose, and funds are different officer concerns. Each phrase on the letter points at different paper.
Read the guideHow to reapply in 2026
This page covers the 2026 reapplication rules, GCMS notes, and the order of a resubmission.
Read the guideCanada visitor visa from Nigeria
Processing time, fees in naira, and the CAC and FIRS papers a Nigerian business file uses.
Read the guideA graduation visit refused three times
A Nigerian sibling case: the officer note, the source-of-funds gap, and what the next file had to add.
Read the guide
Documents after a refusal, by country
- Documents that answer a India refusal
- Documents that answer a Nigeria refusal
- Documents that answer a Philippines refusal
- Documents that answer a Pakistan refusal
- Documents that answer a Ghana refusal
- Documents that answer a Bangladesh refusal
- Documents that answer a Cameroon refusal
- Documents that answer a China refusal
- Documents that answer a Kenya refusal
- Documents that answer a Singapore refusal
Related
If the letter cites 179(b), the file is the problem.
If it cites a section from 34 to 42, a new visitor application does not clear it.
See the main issue on your letter →Sources
- Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, current to September 21, 2026, last amended March 26, 2026
- IRPA section 11 — visa only if not inadmissible and the requirements are met
- IRPA sections 34 to 42 — the inadmissibility grounds
- IRPA section 24 — temporary resident permit
- IRPA section 52 — no return after an enforced removal without authorization
- IRPR section 1 — definition of excessive demand
- IRPR section 18 — deemed rehabilitation
- IRPR section 179 — temporary resident visa
- Criminal Code section 320.19 — impaired operation, maximum 10 years
- IRCC fee list — inadmissibility fees, retrieved September 28, 2026
- IRCC — Reasons you may be inadmissible
- IRCC — Rehabilitation for past criminal activity (guide 5312)
- IRCC — Overcome criminal convictions
- IRCC — Temporary resident permits
General information from the regulation and IRCC’s public pages. Not legal advice. Not a prediction of a visa decision.